NEWS ALERT

NEWS UPDATE : Asian Cricket Third Sri Lanka-Pakistan ODI abandoned due to rain COLOMBO: The third One-day International between Sri Lanka and Pakistan was abandoned due to rain here at the R Premadasa Stadium on Wednesday. The umpires made this decision after consulting ... Australia want to master all forms of game: Clarke SYDNEY: Australia's limited-overs tour of England and Ireland represents the start of a two-year campaign to make them the top nation in all three forms of the game, captain Michael Clarke said ... Bopara glad to be back for England SOUTHAMPTON, England: Ravi Bopara is eager to make up for lost times as he tries to revive his ... South Africa name unchanged squad for England series JOHANNESBURG: South Africa have kept faith with a winning formula by naming an unchanged squad for the three-Test series in England starting next month, Cricket South Africa (CSA) announced on ...


Thursday, August 11, 2011

India greats in cash-for-comment row

NEW DELHI :Former India captains Sunil Gavaskar and Ravi Shastri have been accused of a conflict of interest amid claims payments from the Indian cricket board would sway their television commentary.The weekly news magazine Outlook devoted the front-page of its latest edition to the duo, who reportedly receive 36 million rupees (800,000 dollars) a year from the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).Gavaskar, 62, and Shastri, 49, both highly respected voices in Indian cricket, are paid by the BCCI to commentate on almost every series India plays at home or abroad.Shastri also serves on the International Cricket Council's cricket committee, of which Gavaskar is a past member.Cricket pundits say Gavaskar and Shastri are unlikely to criticise or speak against the policies of the BCCI."Every commentary box in the world has its share of supremacists and propagandists, England and Australia no exception," cricket analyst Rahul Bhattacharya told the magazine.But it's extraordinary that the Indian board has made it institutional.Gavaskar, in England to commentate on the ongoing India series, insisted his contract did not stop him from airing his views."I would advise to all who are saying that there is a conflict of interest to actually see my work, listen to what I say, and then judge me," Gavaskar told Outlook in reply to the accusations."In my columns, I speak strongly against BCCI policies. I?m not beholden to the BCCI. My contract has nothing to do with the views I express as a columnist and commentator.The BCCI said the charges of conflict of interest were "trivial and frivolous""The board pays them for their professional qualities," BCCI vice-president and official spokesman Rajiv Shukla said."They are outstanding commentators and respected at the international level. What they have achieved is because of their personal talent."These are trivial and frivolous allegations. It is not fair to suggest that there is a conflict of interest because BCCI never dictates on what they should say.